Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03122 12
Original file (03122 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204

 

JET
Docket No. 3122-12
14 Nov 12

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N323 dtd 14 May 12
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr.
George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1
October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Sa eee... eee

Docket No. 3122-12
RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

a. He was enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1, effective 15
November 2011 (Active Duty Service Date). Petitioner met the advanced
paygrade criteria based on college credits. NOTE: The change in the
effective date of advancement to E-3 may also impact on Petitioner's
E-4 advancement opportunity. If Petitioner was eligible for, but did
not take an E-4 examination in March 2012 because the above change had
not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to remediate
that missed opportunity. Petitioner should take the next available
E-4 advancement examination. Once Petitioner receives his next
profile sheet he may reapply to this Board for consideration of
advancement to E-4 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have been
advanced on the “missed” examination cycle. Petitioner should then
submit copies of worksheets for March 2012 and September 2012 missed
cycles. In addition, Petitioner should submit a DD Form 149, command
endorsement /recommendation, and must include a copy of this letter
with the request. The Board will then determine whether the request
will be approved.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4, It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board’s proceedings in the above entitl

  

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN fe W
Recorder Actin
Bi, Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

14 Nov 12

pewter 4 Wtcbyn.

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Acting, Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0540-13

    Original file (NR0540-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Purguant.to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to that he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 September 2013 and, pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below ghould be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01378 12

    Original file (01378 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6432 14

    Original file (NR6432 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. If petitioner was eligible for, but did not take the E-4 examination in September 2013, March 2014 and September 2014 because the above change had not yet been made, the following procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02346 12

    Original file (02346 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 October 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0099 14

    Original file (NR0099 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1l. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman; Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0005 14

    Original file (NR0005 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01595-09

    Original file (01595-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 May 2009...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12367-08

    Original file (12367-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13337-09

    Original file (13337-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1l, 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2930 14

    Original file (NR2930 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (&) Subject, filed enclosure (1) with nereinafter referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to ites regulations,...